On January 25, 2005, I was at my mother's house on Kovener Street in Crothersville, Indiana moving some furniture for her to a new residence. That afternoon, a few blocks from where my mother lived a young girl named Katlyn Collman left her home to run an errand for her mother.
She never returned, and was found 5 days later in a creek near Seymour, Indiana.
Local residents became concerned about Katie and began searching all over Jackson County for the young girl. Meanwhile I loaded my pickup truck full of my mother's belongings and went home to my rural Jackson County home to unload this truck and get a little bit of sleep before reporting for my third shift job at Valeo Sylvania.
Two days after Katie's disappearance, an eye-witness came forward who claimed they saw Katie riding in a white Ford F150 on the day she was reported missing. The eye-witness described the man as a tall, very skinny white male, 18-20 years old, dark hair and fair complexion.
The media issued this composite sketch of this man:
The evening that the Amber Alert was issued, Indiana State Police trooper Robert Simpson came to my residence because they had ran a DMV search for white Ford F150 trucks and I owned such a vehicle. In fact, this truck was the one I was using to help my mother move. The police questioned me about my activities the day that Collman disappeared. I was honest in answering their questions and admitted to being in the area she was last seen the evening she became missing. There were no eye-witnesses to my being there, but I gave the police the information because I had nothing to hide. They asked for permission to search my vehicle without a warrant and I obliged them. I also went to the State Police post that evening and voluntarily submitted to a polygraph exam. At the conclusion of this exam, I was told nothing further would be needed and there was no reason to hold me for further questioning. I had passed the exam.
I soon forgot about the incident until early April 2005. At that time, the Indiana State Police once again came to my residence and asked me to provide a DNA sample. Again, as I had nothing to hide, I willingly submitted to the test.
Imagine my surprise when two days later I was arrested on charges of molesting Collman near the time of her death. Prosecutors claim that my DNA matched DNA found on a cigarette butt as well as on the girl's body. At the time of my arrest, another man was in custody for Collman's murder-Charles "Chuckie" Hickman. Hickman claimed that Collman saw drug activity in a local apartment complex and abducted the girl in hopes of scaring her into silence. He claimed that he drove her to the lake in a white Ford F150, which was borrowed from his friend, Timothy O"Sullivan. Timothy O'Sullivan had been charged with false informing in the case, along with an unnamed 17 year old male. Police claim that they thoroughly investigated and could find no relationship between Hickman and myself. Also, one week prior to my arrest, the Jackson County prosecutor wrote a letter to the editor of the local paper explaining why he was reluctant to seek the death penalty against Hickman. One reason he stated was the lack of mitigating circumstances (child molesting).
Three weeks later, Hickman was being transported from the county jail to a court appearance. At that time, he was questioned by the media as to his involvement in Collman's death. This time, he stated that he was there and saw who did it, but did not commit the crime himself. When asked by reporters who in his opinion killed Katie Collman, Hickman replied "Jeff Tatlock raped that girl."
Hickman's mother had previously stated that she believed her son gave a false confession out of fear. Mrs. Hickman stated that Chuckie was afraid of a man who had blown up his house in a fire in late 2004 while cooking methamphetamine. That man was Jeffrey Tatlock.
Six weeks later, Hickman's story was abruptly discharged and I was charged with Collman's murder and confinement along with her molestation. On his way out of the jail, Hickman still maintained that he was there and saw what had happened and that police were charging the wrong man.
Indeed, Hickman gave quite credible testimony. He named a man as an accomplice who closely resembled the composite sketch given by the eyewitness. He stated that the girl saw drug activity in a local apartment complex, for which she was abducted to scare her into silence. That same apartment had been the focus of two earlier investigations into drug activity in the month prior to her disappearance. No arrests were ever made. In addition, the names of those in the complex were never released to the public.
Nearly a year passed while I awaited trial. It was suddenly decided that Grand Jury investigation would not be needed. Still, I had faith that the system would work as it was intended, and that my attorney, James Kilburn, a deacon of my church had my best interests at heart and would fight to have these charges overturned.
But Kilburn did not do this, even though he was not appointed as a public defender, but rather paid by my mother. Because prosecutors were seeking the death penalty, I should have been assigned two death penalty certified attorneys. This did not happen. Nor did Kilburn ask for a change of venue, even though this case had received national media attention.
Several months passed without any evidence being turned over to Mr. Kilburn, including the alleged DNA evidence. Meanwhile, the FBI continued to ask for DNA samples from other suspects. My family and friends donated money to Kilburn to pay for the retesting of the DNA evidence. Mr. Kilburn is unable to explain what he did with these donations.
For reasons I cannot disclose at this time, I accepted a plea agreement in March 2006. Let's just say I was "convinced" that this would be in my best interest. When the plea agreement was announced, then-Prosecutor Stephen Pierson announced that I would be changing my plea to guilty and that it would not be necessary to state how the crime occurred as Indiana Law requires.
Several witnesses were called to testify on behalf of the prosecution, most surprising my wife Tabitha. When I was arrested Tabitha was my most adamant supporter. During the press conference that was called after charges were reversed, she stated that she had had threats on her life. I believe she too was somehow "convinced" to change her testimony. Although Tabitha claims that the DNA evidence is what convinced her, that is not true. She loyally stood by me for many months even after prosecutors claimed that DNA evidence led to my arrest. After being sent to the Indiana Department of Corrections, my brother Troy filed for divorce from her on my behalf.
None of the witnesses were cross-examined by Kilburn, nor was any evidence introduced into public record. Only after receiving my life sentence did I learn that a forensic report existed that showed no evidence of Katie having been inside my vehicle. Hickman did not testify, nor did the eyewitness who saw Collman in the pickup truck.
So what happened to the DNA evidence? How can a man be sentenced to life without parole for a crime in without ever being able to see the evidence against him? At this point, I am not sure if the DNA is non-existent, has been tampered with, or if the cigarette butt may have been taken from my truck when it was searched. I am not guilty of this crime and welcome re-testing of the DNA to prove my innocence.
Thank you for allowing me to share a side of the story that has not been told by the media. I hope I have caused you to think about how easy it is for anyone to be convicted of a crime they did not commit and how often it truly occurs.
Sincerely
Tony
3 comments:
Katie went missing on Jan. 25, 2005. The Amber Alert for this child was not issued until two days after her disappearance. Investigators claimed that this was because they did not have enough information to issue the alert. Investigators said that the eyewitness who claimed to have seen Katie riding in the white Ford F-150 did not come forward until Jan. 27, 2005 to supply the information necessary for the alert.
With no information as to her whereabouts on Jan. 25, 2005, police should have been knocking on doors of family and other children that Katie might have been visiting in their attempts to find her.
In an article posted Feb. 18, 2005 in the Seymour Daily Tribune, entitled Police Make Meth Busts, authorities claim that on the evening of Jan. 25, 2005, they went to the RURAL home of a known drug dealer looking for Collman. This was not a family man, and there weren't other children there that Katie may have been visiting. While at this home, police state that they found an active anhdrous amonia lab, but, made no arrests.
Something about that just isn't right. Something or someone had to have led them to that house. Furthermore, if they had enough info to lead them to this house, they had enough info to issue the Amber Alert on the eve of her disappearance instead of stalling for two days.
Hello. I'd like to say that I never thought for a second that Mr. Stockelman had anything to do with this crime. Although, I don't think that Chuckie Hickman killed this girl, I do believe that much of the information that he gave police was relevant to the crime. I see that you have a pic of the composite posted, here is a link to a news article picturing one of the men implicated by Hickman.
http://www.theindychannel.com/news/4167704/detail.html
You both pose some very good points. I would agree with anonymous #2, that it is not likely that Hickman did kill this girl, but the fact does remain that he gave information that was extremely accurate. Such as that photograph you linked here. For those who haven't seen this, you should probably take a look. If you haven't seen it before, you will be amazed.
Post a Comment